<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Treyarch returns with Call of Duty: World at War</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.xboxliving.com/2008/06/25/call-of-duty-world-at-war/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.xboxliving.com/2008/06/25/call-of-duty-world-at-war/</link>
	<description>An unofficial eye on Xbox Live.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 04:48:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2008 Xbox 360 Release Schedule &#124; Xbox Living</title>
		<link>http://www.xboxliving.com/2008/06/25/call-of-duty-world-at-war/comment-page-1/#comment-1378</link>
		<dc:creator>2008 Xbox 360 Release Schedule &#124; Xbox Living</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 03:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xboxliving.com/?p=128#comment-1378</guid>
		<description>[...] Call of Duty: World at War [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Call of Duty: World at War [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rocco</title>
		<link>http://www.xboxliving.com/2008/06/25/call-of-duty-world-at-war/comment-page-1/#comment-1004</link>
		<dc:creator>rocco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 17:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xboxliving.com/?p=128#comment-1004</guid>
		<description>i was not at all happpy with Treyarch and call of duty 3 infact i think they should have never made it and made cod4 cod3 so needless to say i was not happy when i realized theyed be taakeing over. the fact that theyve worked the game for less than a year again convinces me that they are just trying to make more money off of cod4. Sad byt probably true</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i was not at all happpy with Treyarch and call of duty 3 infact i think they should have never made it and made cod4 cod3 so needless to say i was not happy when i realized theyed be taakeing over. the fact that theyve worked the game for less than a year again convinces me that they are just trying to make more money off of cod4. Sad byt probably true</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert K.</title>
		<link>http://www.xboxliving.com/2008/06/25/call-of-duty-world-at-war/comment-page-1/#comment-701</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 23:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xboxliving.com/?p=128#comment-701</guid>
		<description>The trailer for CoD: World At War looks nice, and flamethrowers are always a plus, but I don&#039;t know if I will drop my MP5 or G36c to pick up an M1 or Thompson again.  CoD4 hit all the right notes so well for an FPS, that it&#039;s going to take much more than going back to WWII in the Pacific region to get me to enjoy it.

I&#039;ll probably give a try though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The trailer for CoD: World At War looks nice, and flamethrowers are always a plus, but I don&#8217;t know if I will drop my MP5 or G36c to pick up an M1 or Thompson again.  CoD4 hit all the right notes so well for an FPS, that it&#8217;s going to take much more than going back to WWII in the Pacific region to get me to enjoy it.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll probably give a try though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

